Zombie Films: PANDEMIA (2016) Really bad? -Inmortal Moral

A Zombie movie, where it is known to be caused by a virus that has five stages, of which, the world only told of the first four. Besides that in the first stage is treatable, even curable.

The way to see the film, is through cameras, but placed in protective helmets of the protagonists, is a bit annoying because it changes from camera to camera, but as a good point, they are not cameras of poor quality, they have a good definition

The story brings us some characters, who are underdeveloped, one being told by the doctor, because of the identification it brings, the doctor who participated in the creation of the virus and can help to stop it. They risk a lot to save her, even telling her if it is infected that she conceals it and when they return they treat and cure her, unlike the rest, she asks that she abandon them. A doctor is more important, especially if it helps a possible cure.

During the course of the plot, it is noted that they give the doctor some paper, but they see that it does not act as such, and they begin to suspect. They separate and the doctor confesses to a member of the group that is not doctor, that found the identification. Then you join them or another team member who had gone astray before. They find the group they are trying to rescue, and that's where she discovers that the doctor is not a doctor. Here is a mistake in the plot, if they wanted help to escape, and they had an ambulance where they fit, so that they needed help? If they could drive and leave. The group left, leaving the last two members of the rescue group. The member heeded the one that pretended to be the doctor and they go to the house by the family of this, but the husband died, and the daughter is infected. Here the error is in the driver is left waiting and the infected come thing that happened because the woman was put to do the infection test to her daughter and shows the result to the camera, wastes time looking for food in the house for her Daughter, besides watching the video of the husband, it does not matter the fact that she finds her suit to her, and the terrible ideas that she took to be able to leave alive.


The plot of mother worried about her family, is really good idea for a film of this type. But they did not do well, some performances are unbelievable and even exaggerated. It was not easy to see, it is from those films that when you see them once, you are no longer interested in seeing it again, in addition to the errors mentioned above.

Something new?
Almost none, only this movie, apparently infected, can handle cars, when it is in some of the early stages and for the characters of the film is new that the infected eat humans. This is due to lack of food, they resort to cannibalism, but like other zombie movies, they prefer uninfected meat to eat between them.

The effects?
Normally I do not criticize this part, but there was a scene where supposedly there was fire in the city, but the fire is SO false, it shows that it is digital.

Final score: 25 out of 100.

Since it's a movie that gets lost in the pile, it's only for B rating. If you like zombies, this movie is not for you.

Zombie Films: Zompires (2016),El Enjambre (2016) , Extinction(2011)

Zompires (2016)

A film of more action than gore, a good plot and now, the zombies, have a more animal behavior: They travel in herd and there is an alpha or boss, not forgetting that the sun burns them and kills them, as if they were vampires.

The story, is of interesting action and very according to the subject, has traitors, desperados, sacrifices. It is advisable, although it may feel a little slow in some points, but almost no one gives an account.

Final score is: 80 - 100

 Extinction(2011) 

Very interesting?

An interesting movie, really. The protagonists have their character, you can see some romances, and the zombie virus was created but there was an accident and the only one who knows how to create a cure is dying from radiation. It can not be classified as gore, but it has enough action.

The characters make the story interesting, although the plot is loose in some points, for some characters is beneficial. At the end of the film, they seem to imply that they can see a sequel, and that has not happened yet.

Something new?
Now the virus zombies can affect some and others do not, if any member of the family does not affect you, the possibility that another member is immune is high. Those affected can inherit immunity or not. This for me is novel, although in other films it has been said that for some the virus does not affect them, here they give a reason, or at least that was new for me.
The zombies, now do parkour, is to make a very interesting enemy.
Now, the zombies do not die for

Final score: 100 - 100.

El Enjambre (2016) 

Original? New?

The originality of this film is amazing. Zombies act like a swarm, organized, are not interested in eating the uninfected, simply infect them and live their lives as if nothing.

This virus acts as if they all connected infected, a kind of social network.
That the memories are transferred and in the same film mention two examples of it. From this point of view, (at least for me) is novel.

The plot, introduces us to a subject who is infected, but it is a case in which he apparently disconnects, temporarily, and tries to remember everything. We can see, a lot of memories, that are not just his and presents us moments before this virus gets out of control. Maybe the whole plot is presented through memories, but it is well done and gives us to understand the plot.

Final Score: 100 -100.
Highly recommended, a movie, which is novel.

Films Zombie: Sin salida (No Exit) (2016), Stressful? Great plot gap? Recommendable? -Inmortal Moral

The way the story is presented is seen from the point of view of the protagonist. It is similar to watching the movie from the point of view of the protagonist using a video camera, but here is not used a camera but, what the same protagonist sees with his eyes. This means that we do not have to support an inefficient video camera quality (as it usually is).

Seeing everything from the point of view of the protagonist, it does not stop being stressful, which makes the viewer feel as if he lived what he is watching, something good, to get into the film if the viewer is a person easy to impact. Although for some, this can become annoying to be equal if a camera was used.

The plot:
There are two stories that are presented, which seem to be related but not as one thinks.
The first story, tells us how a mother and her daughter try to survive a world of zombies. The story begins when in a car, a child's hand drops blood that apparently comes from the father of the infant, a girl, she and her mother run away and apparently a zombie follows, seems to be able to reach the girl.

The second story, is a man who discovers that he is going to become a father, this person receives messages from his father about a conspiratorial event, which the protagonist of this story, ignores. He discovers that his wife is infected, they end up killing her, flees with a friend, they have to escape, they end up with a group of believers, and more events. The strange thing is that the protagonist has dreams that he persecutes people being a zombie, when he discovers that he is infected (when he is infected it takes to take effect, since he had a week infected), they tell him of a girl who was bitten , But the virus has no effect on it, which suggests that this is the relationship between both stories, very simple, at first glance. When the virus begins to take effect its vision changes, which makes it look like a video camera, which makes it desperate.

These two stories, they begin to be related when they tell the protagonist of the second story, about a bitten girl that had no effect the infection and believe possible cure or a hope for humanity. But seeing the union between the two stories, it is not as you can think (unless they speak of another film or story that is not mentioned), the protagonist's dreams attacking uninfected people, make you think that Are visions of what can happen. Due to this union of the two stories, it makes us think that there is more than simple zombies, leaves a big gap in the plot, which makes us think that the father of the protagonist of the second story, has an important clue to say about conspiracy .

The acting of the actors, is quite good, and it is best seen how the film is recorded, from the point of view of the protagonist, which makes it look more real.

Some details of the second story are:
That the zombie virus has a delayed effect, as a friend of the protagonist, had no symptoms until it was injured, but not because of a zombie, this suggests that the virus is in the air or is activated with a wound made of any way.
The protagonist, was touched by the blood of an infected (the wife), but we do not know if it was only superficial, or entered by a wound, which makes think, like the previous point, that there are more ways to become infected, but As this form was slower than that of his friend.
It is not known whether by the blow that was made to the friend or by the smell of blood the blood, was the cause of the infection of this one.


Some details of the first story are:

• It is not known whether or not the child is infected, but the mother has a wound. Knowing the details of the second story, we can assume many situations.

When is it advisable for a person?

• This movie can be stressful if you are easy to hit, so this movie is recommended for you.
• If you are one of those people who make theories, this movie is recommended for you, since you can analyze a lot of data for it.
• If you like gore (everything the zombies do), then this movie does not have much of it, but it would be recommendable.
• If you are not one of those people previously mentioned, you may not be very interested in the movie.

 Due to the great gap and doubts that leaves the film, the final score is: 80 of 100.

Films: TED 1 and 2.. ¿Good or Bad? -Inmortal Moral

The movie begins with a Bear bearing life for the desire of a child, nothing can be more beautiful. The case became famous as forgotten. The story revolves on how the protagonists grow and how life should live and that the Bear must grow. It may seem like a story whose plot can be considered childish, but in the end it is only a childish adulterated, with drugs sex and alcohol.

While in the first film tries to make one of the protagonists grow, in the second tries to be considered human. The second film has a better story, of how something can be considered human.

Both the first and the second are the same villain, who can get more profit, but do not, leaving the do what can make a good complement in the history of the two TED films.


In the end, it's not so bad, I give it 80 out of 100, since the jokes are okay.