Films: Rey Arturo (2017) Review | Inmortal Moral

Rey Arturo

Una pelicula más del Rey Arturo, pero aqui uno detalle que puede contar como spoilers:

• Si te gusta el Mago Merlín y esperas verlo, te vas a decepcionar un poco, ya que aparece poco, pero sabemos que lo que hace es importante. Lo que esperas que haga el en la pelicula, no hace tanto como uno espera, ya que en lugar de estar a lado de Arturo, hay otra maga que hace esta parte del papel. Fuera de este punto, lo demás es más que aceptable. 

 La historia empieza con una especie de guerra entre humanos y los magos, gracias a un mago que quizo el poder, ataco al Rey (Padre de Arturo). Despues de esto, se ve una especie de una vision rapida de la vida de Arturo,  desde que es niño hasta que es grande, uno puede decir que está demaciado rapido y notar que desarrolla ciertas habilidades por crecer en las calles, pero parece que dejan varios detalles de lado y que uno debe ser atento a ello.

Por trauma cree que es el hijo bastardo, hasta que logra sacar (obviamente) la espada.  El personaje principal parece que niega por trauma su pasado y dice que es un hijo bastardo, aunque tiene sueños de lo que habia pasado. Cuando saca la espada, (cosa que no le importa), sus recuerdos se hacen más fuertes y el poder de la espada esta para su uso, pero como el protagonista niega su pasado, se niega al poder de la espada.

Personajes

El personaje principal, a pesar de lo anterior dicho, vemos que si tiene un buen desarrollo, y eso que vimos como fue su vida, rapidamente desde niño hasta adulto, lo que puede lograr a molestar. Los personajes que son los aliados, son interesantes, si hay momentos graciosos con ellos ya la vez, muestran su desprecio hacia Arturo, por la vida que tuvo en las calles,  su forma de ser, pero lo respetan a pesar de todo.

Musica

Contiene buena musica, que va con el momento, pero en algunas veces, la musica puede llegar a ser molesta, ya que de un ritmo cambia a otro, y no tienen musica de fondo que haga que el cambio sea más amigable, pero aún asi, tiene muy buena banda sonora.

Concluciónes finales

Tal vez sea una pelicula más, pero esta hecho para un publico joven, tiene más magia de lo que uno piensa, es más fantaciosa hasta punto, pero no es fastidiosa de ver. A veces, en algunas peliculas cuando resaltan una parte, ya sea el terror, fantacia, trama,etc, que lo hace muy cargado, es dificil de verla, ya que es sumir demaciado en un corto tiempo, pero esta pélicua no es así.

Es bastane buena, y es recomendable. La puntiuación final es 100 /100.

King Arthur

A movie more of King Arthur, but here a detail that can count as spoilers:

•     If you like the Merlin Wizard and expect to see it, you will be disappointed a bit, as it appears little, but we know that what it does is important. What you expect him to do in the movie, not so long as one expects, since instead of being next to Arturo, there is another magician who does this part of the role. Out of this point, the rest is more than acceptable.

 The story begins with a kind of war between humans and wizards, thanks to a magician who wanted power, I attack the King (Arturo's father). After this, you see a kind of a quick vision of Arturo's life, since he is a child until he is big, one can say that he is too fast and notice that he develops certain skills to grow in the streets, but they seem to leave Several side details and that one should be attentive to it.


From trauma he thinks he is the bastard son, until he manages to draw (obviously) the sword. The main character seems to be traumatic denying his past and says he is a bastard child, although he has dreams of what had happened. When he draws the sword (which he does not mind), his memories become stronger and the power of the sword is for his use, but as the protagonist denies his past, he denies the power of the sword.

Characters

The main character, despite the above said, we see that if it has a good development, and that we saw how was his life, quickly from child to adult, which can get annoying. The characters that are the allies are interesting, if there are funny moments with them and at the same time, show their contempt for Arturo, for the life he had in the streets, his way of being, but respect him in spite of everything.

Music

It contains good music, which goes with the moment, but in some cases, the music can become annoying, since one rhythm changes to another, and they do not have background music that makes the change more friendly, but still , Has very good soundtrack.

Final Concluding Remarks

Perhaps it is a movie more, but it is made for a young audience, it has more magic than one thinks, it is more fantatious until the point, but it is not fastidious to see. Sometimes, in some movies when they highlight a part, be it terror, fantacy, plot, etc., that makes it very loaded, it is difficult to see it, since it is disappearing too much in a short time, but this pelicua is not like that.


It is quite good, and it is recommended. The final puntiuación is 100/100.

Los locos Addams 1 1991 (Curiosidades macabras y mini teoría) -Inmortal Moral

Se que ha pasado décadas desde su estreno, pero no esta de más decir..

Resumen sin spoler

La historia es la de una familia perdió a un ser querido, pero este vuelve. Y cosas suceden: Un complot para quitar dinero, y causar problemas a la familia Addams. Problemas que hacen que la familia tenga que superar, pero como se trata de la familia no típica, los problemas se toman de maneras diferentes. Lo que hace que sea entretenido.

Curiosidades  Macabras(Spoiler)

Lo curioso, es que todo lo que nosotros consideramos malo y de susto, a esta familia le divierte:
-Los juegos de los hijos de la familia: Cuando el hijo casi muere, pero es una familia con ADN diferente. Supongo que era normal no morir por más que se accidenten.
-En el desayuno, el hijo trae un letrero de parada (STOP), lo cual causa un accidente y a la familai le divierten.
-Los trenes peligrosos que explotan (¿No era obvio?).
-Los trenes tienen pasajeros vivos y cuando explotan ¿Mueren?
-Cuando buscan que donar a la subasta, se encuentran con la ropa de un personaje y luego con el cuerpo del mismo.  
-Cuando la Señora Addams lleva al tío a pasear por el cementerio. Explica la muerte de los familiares, no es muy lindo.
-Cuando creen que lo han descubierto, llama a la madre(la que lo rescato), y al parecer los niños juegan otro juego macabro.

Tantas cosas macabras, sin olvidar la sana y visible vida sexual de la pareja Morticia y Homero Addams.

Mini Teoría

Cuando dedos (la mano), entra dónde esta el Tio Lucas, me ha dado a pensar que dedos masturbaba a Lucas o al menos algo antes que Lucas desapareciera. No se porqué dedos le visita siendo de noche... solo lo pienso. 

Efectos especiales y escenarios

Los escenarios son bastante buenos,  van a la mano con el tipo de familia que son y su estilo de vida. Los efectos especiales, diría lo mismo, no son muchos pero al menos no hacen ver mal el resto.  

Conclusión 

La historia en si es divertida, pero los chistes de doble sentido y no en el tono sexual.
Aunque es vieja, es bastante buena. La historia es entretenida, un poco drama y los problemas familiares con toque oscuro. Recomendable, la puntuación que le doy es de 100 de 100.

Teorias Steven Universe: ¿Quien mato a Diamante Rosa? -Inmortal Moral

                                           
Bueno, ya sabemos que esto se veía venir. Lo único suficientemente fuerte para destruir un diamante sería otro diamante, al menos en la vida real. Si la creadora de Steven Universe hace más realista entonces ya sabemos quien es el culpable, pero ella puede poner lo que desee, si una parla lo destruyo y no Rose Cuarso, bueno es asunto de ella. No vamos a criticar nada de su creación solo trataremos de deducir lo que nos quiere decir.


¿Qué nos quiere decir el abogado de Steven?
Que Diamante Rosa estaba con todo su personal cerca. ¿Nadie pudo ver a Rose? ¿Nadie dio aviso? ¿Nadie se dio cuenta? ¿Las Zafiros no lo han predicho? ¿Dónde estaba la perla de Diamante Rosa?

Todas estas preguntas indican un solo camino:Ayuda desde adentro. Los posibles candidatos en este complot serían los que se podrían acercar fácilmente:

• Perla Rosa: Ya que siempre esta a su lado. 
• Diamante Blanco: Con autoridad. 
• Diamante Amarillo: Con autoridad. 

Son las tres posibles sospechosas que pudieron ayudar a Rose Cuarzo en el ataque hacia Diamante Rosa. Y en ese ataque Diamante Rosa fue destruida, pero ¿Rose podría hacerlo? Como mencionamos antes: "Lo único que es suficiente mente fuerte para destruir un diamante es otro diamante", claro en la vida real, pero no sabemos si la creadora de la serie tomaría esto en cuenta.  Si pensamos que si, entonces el comportamiento de Diamante Amarillo seria sospechoso:

Cualquier cosa es aceptable para pasar el juicio a la ejecución:

• Quiso pasar a la ejecución solo por la apariencia de Steven.
• Con lo que dijo el fiscal se le hizo suficiente para pasar a la ejecución.
• Con lo que decía Steven, de que era culpable le bastó. 

Solo quería matar a Steven y con eso le bastó, si no fuera por Azul, ya estaría muerto.

La cara de Amarillo cuando Steven dijo que era culpable, se nota que ella sabe que Rose es inocente pero que Steven crea que es culpable, la pone  un poco despistada.







La explicación de Steven no es muy coherente ya que menciona cosas al azar, ya que no sabe como pasó todo,

Cuando menciona el arma de Bismuto (punto de quiebre), Azul habla y dice que con una espada.
Y un aura azul cubre todo el lugar, haciendo que todas las gemas lloren, excepto Lars, ya que es un humano completo. También eso explica como pudo llorar en el Steven Bomb 6, cuando tubo los sueños viendo todo desde el punto de vista de Diamante Azul, pero eso es historia a parte,ya que no creo que esa aura azul cubra todo el planeta, más bien, creo que se conecto mentalmente con ella.

Cuando el abogado hace la explicación usando el palanquin de Diamante Azul, la reacción de Azul es de tristeza mientras que Amarillo solo voltea a verla, como sintiendo tristeza, pero al ver así a Azul, no por la muerte de Rosa.


La reacción de Azul cuando el abogado de Steven deduce que el verdadero culpable es alguien de autoridad como un Diamante.
Esto me hace pensar que Azul empezara a cuestionar todo lo que tenga que ver con la muerte de Diamante Rosa, incluso se pelea con Amarillo cuando esta quita las forma física al fiscal y al abogado.


Todo esto hace ver a Diamante Amarillo como culpable, pero ¿Por que?
¿Un posible amorío con Azul y Rosa se interponía?


¿O era por el geo gema que puso en la tierra? Sabemos que la Tierra tiene muchos recursos, pero a Diamante Amarillo le importaba la geo gema, pero como el planeta era de Diamante Rosa, es un obstáculo. Este es otro punto de favor para que Amarillo tenga motivos para destruir a Rosa.

Ahora veamos lo que sabemos de Diamante Blanco, que es nada,  ya que no podemos mencionar nada de ella, lo único que lo puede hacer ver culpable es que es alguien con autoridad, como para acercarse a Diamante Rosa sin levantar sospechas, además es un diamante con la fuerza suficiente para destruir otro diamante.

Ahora Perla Rosa. A pesar que los fans ya pensaron como sería la posible forma de Perla Rosa, es la primera vez que se menciona en la serie a la Perla de Diamante Rosa. Podemos decir que Rose Cuarzo, pudo hacerse pasar por la Perla para acercarse sin levantar sospechas, pero como sabemos que Diamante Rosa salio de su palanquín, puede que Rose la atacara por atrás y un Diamante la destrozara, pero como hubo testigos, llamaron a Rubi (ojito), ella vio, pero solo mencionaron la espada de Rose que solo destruye el cuerpo no la gema. Así que Rose no pudo haber sido ella sola, tubo que tener cómplices....

Así que si no fue un Diamante, Rose Cuarzo obtuvo ayuda de uno.

Siguiese en mis redes sociales:  InmortalMoral LaGataNegra
Video: Teorías de Steven Universe: Muerte de Diamante Rosa y predicciones
Ingles: Who Killed PD?

Steven Universe Theories: Who Killed Pink Diamond? -Inmortal Moral

                       
Well, we know this was coming. The only thing strong enough to destroy a diamond would be another diamond, at least in real life. If the creator of Steven Universe makes it more realistic then we know who is to blame, but she can put what you want, if a parla destroyed it and Rose Cuarso, well it's her business. We will not criticize anything of its creation only try to deduce what it wants to say.


What does Steven's lawyer mean?
That Diamond Rose was with all her staff nearby. No one could see Rose? Nobody gave notice? No one noticed? Have the Sapphires not predicted? Where was the Pearl of Diamond Pink?

All of these questions indicate only one path: Help from within. The possible candidates in this plot would be the ones that could be easily approached:

• Perla Rosa: Since he is always by his side.
• White Diamond: With authority.
• Yellow Diamond: With authority.

They are the three possible suspects who could help Rose Quartz in the attack on Diamond Rose. And in that attack Diamond Rose was destroyed, but could Rose do it? As we mentioned before: "The only thing that is strong enough to destroy a diamond is another diamond", clear in real life, but we do not know if the creator of the series would take this into account. If we think that yes, then the behavior of Yellow Diamond would be suspect:

Anything is acceptable to pass judgment to execution:

• He wanted to go into execution just for Steven's appearance.
• With what the prosecutor said he was made enough to proceed to execution.
• With what Steven said, that he was guilty was enough.

I just wanted to kill Steven and that was enough, if it was not for Azul, I'd be dead already.

The face of Amarillo when Steven said she was guilty, it is noticed that she knows that Rose is innocent but that Steven believes that she is guilty, puts it a little absentminded.







Steven's explanation is not very consistent since he mentions things at random, since he does not know how everything happened.







When he mentions Bismuto's weapon (breaking point), Blue speaks and says that with a sword.
And a blue aura covers the whole place, making all the gems cry, except Lars, since he is a complete human. Also that explains how he could cry in the Steven Bomb 6, when I tube the dreams seeing everything from the point of view of Blue Diamond, but that is history aside, since I do not think that blue aura covers the whole planet, I think he mentally connected with her.

When the lawyer makes the explanation using the palanquin of Blue Diamond, the reaction of Azul is of sadness whereas Amarillo only turns to see it, like feeling sadness, but seeing Blue thus, not by the death of Rosa.


Blue's reaction when Steven's lawyer deduces that the real culprit is someone of authority as a Diamond.
This makes me think that Blue began to question everything that has to do with the death of Diamond Rosa, even fight with Amarillo when it removes the physical form to the prosecutor and the lawyer.


All this makes Yellow Diamond look like guilty, but why?
A possible love affair with Azul and Rosa was interposed?


Or was it because of the geo gem he put on the ground? We know that the Earth has many resources, but Yellow Diamond cared about the geo gem, but since the planet was Diamond Pink, it is an obstacle. This is another point of favor for Amarillo to have reasons to destroy Rosa.

Now let's see what we know about White Diamond, which is nothing, since we can not mention anything about it, the only thing that can make you guilty is that it is someone with authority, as to approach Diamond Rose without raising suspicion, Diamond with enough strength to destroy another diamond.

Now Perla Rosa. Although the fans already thought as it would be the possible form of Perla Rosa, is the first time that is mentioned in the series to the Pearl of Diamond Pink. We can say that Rose Quartz could pass through the Pearl to approach without raising suspicions, but as we know Diamond Rose came out of her palanquin, Rose may attack her from behind and a Diamond destroyed her, but as there were witnesses, they called Rubi (eye), she saw, but only mentioned the sword of Rose that only destroys the body not the gem. So Rose could not have been alone, tube than have accomplices ....

Rose Cuarzo have help of other Diamond?

Youtube:  InmortalMoral LaGataNegra

Theories: Five Night At Freddy Sister Location. -Inmortal Moral

Is the subject the father of children?

I know that the lamp that appears when we watch TV, is very similar to one of the corridors when we play FNAF 4, this can not be evidence that it is the same house, since, as a programmer, re used some elements Saves development time. But of course, in another part of the game, in the mini funtime game freddy and the cameras in the child's house of FNAF 4, in the mini game of Ernan, which makes us think, that the circus is under the house, as well That thinking about the lamp does not sound wrong. But we must think that not only because something appears also elsewhere, it is an evidence, since it can be an easter egg or an element that is reused to save time.

Now, with the aforementioned, we can not say that it is the father, who says he is the father? By a few references? It can be someone who pays rent, or have a different apartment or house than FNAF 4.

The point is, that only by the end when it is seen that its reflection opens the eyes and these are purple or purple, it is thought that it is the father of the children and the beginning of the man of purple.

But they forget that the eyes in people do not shine, it could be said that an explanation is needed to explain the maps and the cameras of the mini game of Ernan (In the monitors you see the rooms of the house of the infant of FNAF 4), which Makes you think, do you need cameras in the home of FNAF 4? So many may say that it is the father, a family friend or another member of the family. Who says he's not the brother? A family friend? Or another worker?

What is the beginnings of the man of purple, then, we can say that yes, but we can not be sure ...

Cameras in the child's home of FNAF 4?

Why do they have these cameras in the house of FNAF 4?
We already know that Baby tells us to hide under the desk and close the door worked for the previous subject ... That was the one that put the cameras? The previous worker?
So ... this guy we're driving is not the father? We can say that the former worker is the father and because of the accident that happened to his son, he left or died. We do not know.

Since only the father would put cameras in his own house, so we can say that a local worker is the father. What need is a person different from the father with the cameras? It is not known.

Now, why the cameras in the playgrounds of FNAF 4? In the hallway, in the door and the closet, and the child's bed. That waits? Do you know that Ernnard is an animatronico who can leave the circus? (False ending). So, would the cameras be to monitor your house? With this last question gives us to understand something ... The animatronic nightmare are real ...

Or at least something real if you visited us during the nights in the game FNAF 4. Just because it was night and we were infants with a great imagination, we thought we saw something else. So like every protective father puts security cameras.

JUST A MOMENT!!! This breaks with the coma theory:

The child of FNAF 4 is in a coma throughout the game. If he is not in a coma, this means that the father (or worker) is a sadist, the brother and his friends were the ones who visited him at night, how is this possible? If you remember the images of the animatronics nightmare of the page of Scott, some images said: Was it me ?. Which translated says: Was I? It makes us think that the child was visited by the brother and his friends. But this breaks with what we see in bed, which are the serum, flowers and pills. You may have received treatment at home, because you could not afford the hospital, but this would make the brother and his friends look like a lot of sadists, since no one would bother the patient. What remains to explain the cameras would be for the child to talk in a dream talking about the animatronics who visited him, hearing this, the father thought about the animatronics of the circus and so put the cameras.

Definitely the parent or worker is sadistic and we check with the ability of animatronics funtime to have infants locked inside them, but we do not know who made them, but we understand that the man of purple has knowledge.

Now we go to the freddy teddy bear of FNAF 4. Before FNAF SL,

,

I thought it was Puppet since the child of FNAF 4, witnessed the death of this one. Now that we talk about cameras in the house, it made me think that Fredbear's bear is not an imaginary friend, it's a camera with audio recording, video, etc. Put to watch the infants and get victims. If Baby, she is good with us in the game, it can be she that talks to the protagonist of FNAF 4, through the bears of Fredbear, an interesting theory to touch. This can be valid as long as the game of FNAF 4 and FNAF SL happen at the same time.

Toy:  Fazbear of FNAF 4

Now we will play the theme of the Fredbear teddy bear, from FNAF 4. In the previous post, we know that the bear talked to him and that was everywhere, in that case we say that it was Baby who speaks to him, but what if he was a worker Or the same father? In case of worker is surprised how irresponsible is the father, but in case of being the father, the same.

Now, think, what if it was the father who spoke to him and not Baby? A good father who for work had no remedy, and as he says at the end of FNAF 4:

https://youtu.be/x_LiXBbmrfE?t=8m17s

Who says that through the FreadBeard bear? Baby or a worker (possibly the father)? Does this have to do with the simple fact that Ernnard could have a human being? As Ernnard says when he pretends to be Baby, "there is a little bit of me in everyone", or something like that when translating it, this means that the father put the memory of his son in Errnard, making the child of FNAF 4, Is inside Ernnard and this when wanting to go out possesses a human body, becoming the man of purple (according to this), the issue is no. The father could not put the memory of the son in an animatronico, since in a mini game (mangle) of FNAF 3, when it comes to get good end, we have this:

An infant crying, and who else cries in FNAF 3?

The answer is: The child who is given the cake for his birthday and puts on the mask of Golden Freddy or Freadbear, ...

So Ernnard did not come to life because they put the memory of an infant (the one of FNAF 4), since the infant of FNAF 4 appears in mini game secrets in FNAF 3 (to see previous images), therefore, if Puppet knew that it was the Birthday of the infant with the mask of Golden Freddy or Freadbear, is that it was Puppet who speaks through the Fredbear Bears, and was not the father nor Baby.

So the theory that the talking Freadbear bears, was actually Puppet stands (currently), and that the reason why Puppet tells the infant that:
Https://youtu.be/x_LiXBbmrfE?t=1m45s

What do you mean by that? A that the infant witnessed the death of Puppet or the animatronics on stage.

So, although the idea of ​​Freadbear's Bears may be to spy on the future victims of the circus, there is no doubt that Puppet used them to communicate with the infant.
Conclusion: Both theories can be certain at certain point, but what does not agree, is the end, with the part of you I will repair, that could not say Puppet, can be another subject, as someone who visits him in the hospital ...

As can be seen in all the entries on this topic of FNAF Sister Location, many theories can become entangled with others and even contradict themselves, but in the end they make sense.

I still have to talk about more theories, and with all the ..

If you want me to talk about something else, tell me in the comments, if you want it to be about FNAF tell me the theory they want you to talk about. Or something else.

Theories: Five Night At Freddy Sister Location. Did Ernnard own the body of the night-laborer we've handled all the time? -Inmortal Moral

(OJO SPOILERS)

We know the real ending, Ernan pretends to be Baby, and leads us to the room of balls, after they attack us and we see everything red, then we see a kinematics in which we are in the apartment or the house, we are in the Part of the bathroom while listening to TV drama music, we see the mirror, the man opens his eyes and these are lilacs. Many theories indicate that it is the man of purple, or the beginning of these, taking into account that the house of FNAF 4 is above the circus and all those details that we will not yet see, for the moment.

Having talked about all of the above, it makes me think ....

Did Ernan own the body of the night worker we've handled all the time?
Apparently yes, using what contains the room of the balls and some other machine of the place. It could be that he put all his memory into the brain of the worker. As we know the human brain is the best computer ever created, with a lot of capacity, so emptying the memory of an animatronico in a human cerbero, does not sound so simple. Now, why did Puppet do the same? How did you see in the FNAF mini game 2. Will you be aware of those Sister location machines? I say no, but the purple man (Ernnad) does not know. They have not asked themselves, why does the man in purple run desperately before an infant soul?

The purple man being possessed by Ernnard thinks that soul can separate him from the body of the human, reason for which he flees, but for some reason, he thinks that hiding inside the animatronic spring bonnie, will help him escape from the souls.

Given, you must have knowledge about the costumes and they are dangerous or at least in the memories of the human.

Now, how about passing on that trauma, Ernnard dispossessed the worker, making the reason why springtrap, "help me" in FNAF 3, is the worker, whose last memory is when Baby le I bring the ball to the room by betraying it. At first, when I realized that springtrap says "Help me", it made me think that the purple man was repentant, but seeing this final, real final in FNAF SL, makes me think that Ernnard no longer owns the body of the worker And this one is confused. Of course, if we think that Ernnard dispossessed him, but just as the worker's soul stayed in the spring bonnie suit and with the traumas of his work, it ended up becoming what we already know. This gives me sadness, an innocent .. maybe the subject that we handle in FNAF SL is not the purple man, but even so, the poor worker was disgraced life and did not see the end of the TV drama.


This concludes this part ... Wait for the next ...

Zombie Films: PANDEMIA (2016) Really bad? -Inmortal Moral

A Zombie movie, where it is known to be caused by a virus that has five stages, of which, the world only told of the first four. Besides that in the first stage is treatable, even curable.

The way to see the film, is through cameras, but placed in protective helmets of the protagonists, is a bit annoying because it changes from camera to camera, but as a good point, they are not cameras of poor quality, they have a good definition

The story brings us some characters, who are underdeveloped, one being told by the doctor, because of the identification it brings, the doctor who participated in the creation of the virus and can help to stop it. They risk a lot to save her, even telling her if it is infected that she conceals it and when they return they treat and cure her, unlike the rest, she asks that she abandon them. A doctor is more important, especially if it helps a possible cure.

During the course of the plot, it is noted that they give the doctor some paper, but they see that it does not act as such, and they begin to suspect. They separate and the doctor confesses to a member of the group that is not doctor, that found the identification. Then you join them or another team member who had gone astray before. They find the group they are trying to rescue, and that's where she discovers that the doctor is not a doctor. Here is a mistake in the plot, if they wanted help to escape, and they had an ambulance where they fit, so that they needed help? If they could drive and leave. The group left, leaving the last two members of the rescue group. The member heeded the one that pretended to be the doctor and they go to the house by the family of this, but the husband died, and the daughter is infected. Here the error is in the driver is left waiting and the infected come thing that happened because the woman was put to do the infection test to her daughter and shows the result to the camera, wastes time looking for food in the house for her Daughter, besides watching the video of the husband, it does not matter the fact that she finds her suit to her, and the terrible ideas that she took to be able to leave alive.


The plot of mother worried about her family, is really good idea for a film of this type. But they did not do well, some performances are unbelievable and even exaggerated. It was not easy to see, it is from those films that when you see them once, you are no longer interested in seeing it again, in addition to the errors mentioned above.

Something new?
Almost none, only this movie, apparently infected, can handle cars, when it is in some of the early stages and for the characters of the film is new that the infected eat humans. This is due to lack of food, they resort to cannibalism, but like other zombie movies, they prefer uninfected meat to eat between them.

The effects?
Normally I do not criticize this part, but there was a scene where supposedly there was fire in the city, but the fire is SO false, it shows that it is digital.

Final score: 25 out of 100.

Since it's a movie that gets lost in the pile, it's only for B rating. If you like zombies, this movie is not for you.

Zombie Films: Zompires (2016),El Enjambre (2016) , Extinction(2011)

Zompires (2016)

A film of more action than gore, a good plot and now, the zombies, have a more animal behavior: They travel in herd and there is an alpha or boss, not forgetting that the sun burns them and kills them, as if they were vampires.

The story, is of interesting action and very according to the subject, has traitors, desperados, sacrifices. It is advisable, although it may feel a little slow in some points, but almost no one gives an account.

Final score is: 80 - 100

 Extinction(2011) 

Very interesting?

An interesting movie, really. The protagonists have their character, you can see some romances, and the zombie virus was created but there was an accident and the only one who knows how to create a cure is dying from radiation. It can not be classified as gore, but it has enough action.

The characters make the story interesting, although the plot is loose in some points, for some characters is beneficial. At the end of the film, they seem to imply that they can see a sequel, and that has not happened yet.

Something new?
Now the virus zombies can affect some and others do not, if any member of the family does not affect you, the possibility that another member is immune is high. Those affected can inherit immunity or not. This for me is novel, although in other films it has been said that for some the virus does not affect them, here they give a reason, or at least that was new for me.
The zombies, now do parkour, is to make a very interesting enemy.
Now, the zombies do not die for

Final score: 100 - 100.

El Enjambre (2016) 

Original? New?

The originality of this film is amazing. Zombies act like a swarm, organized, are not interested in eating the uninfected, simply infect them and live their lives as if nothing.

This virus acts as if they all connected infected, a kind of social network.
That the memories are transferred and in the same film mention two examples of it. From this point of view, (at least for me) is novel.

The plot, introduces us to a subject who is infected, but it is a case in which he apparently disconnects, temporarily, and tries to remember everything. We can see, a lot of memories, that are not just his and presents us moments before this virus gets out of control. Maybe the whole plot is presented through memories, but it is well done and gives us to understand the plot.

Final Score: 100 -100.
Highly recommended, a movie, which is novel.

Films Zombie: Sin salida (No Exit) (2016), Stressful? Great plot gap? Recommendable? -Inmortal Moral

The way the story is presented is seen from the point of view of the protagonist. It is similar to watching the movie from the point of view of the protagonist using a video camera, but here is not used a camera but, what the same protagonist sees with his eyes. This means that we do not have to support an inefficient video camera quality (as it usually is).

Seeing everything from the point of view of the protagonist, it does not stop being stressful, which makes the viewer feel as if he lived what he is watching, something good, to get into the film if the viewer is a person easy to impact. Although for some, this can become annoying to be equal if a camera was used.

The plot:
There are two stories that are presented, which seem to be related but not as one thinks.
The first story, tells us how a mother and her daughter try to survive a world of zombies. The story begins when in a car, a child's hand drops blood that apparently comes from the father of the infant, a girl, she and her mother run away and apparently a zombie follows, seems to be able to reach the girl.

The second story, is a man who discovers that he is going to become a father, this person receives messages from his father about a conspiratorial event, which the protagonist of this story, ignores. He discovers that his wife is infected, they end up killing her, flees with a friend, they have to escape, they end up with a group of believers, and more events. The strange thing is that the protagonist has dreams that he persecutes people being a zombie, when he discovers that he is infected (when he is infected it takes to take effect, since he had a week infected), they tell him of a girl who was bitten , But the virus has no effect on it, which suggests that this is the relationship between both stories, very simple, at first glance. When the virus begins to take effect its vision changes, which makes it look like a video camera, which makes it desperate.

These two stories, they begin to be related when they tell the protagonist of the second story, about a bitten girl that had no effect the infection and believe possible cure or a hope for humanity. But seeing the union between the two stories, it is not as you can think (unless they speak of another film or story that is not mentioned), the protagonist's dreams attacking uninfected people, make you think that Are visions of what can happen. Due to this union of the two stories, it makes us think that there is more than simple zombies, leaves a big gap in the plot, which makes us think that the father of the protagonist of the second story, has an important clue to say about conspiracy .

The acting of the actors, is quite good, and it is best seen how the film is recorded, from the point of view of the protagonist, which makes it look more real.

Some details of the second story are:
That the zombie virus has a delayed effect, as a friend of the protagonist, had no symptoms until it was injured, but not because of a zombie, this suggests that the virus is in the air or is activated with a wound made of any way.
The protagonist, was touched by the blood of an infected (the wife), but we do not know if it was only superficial, or entered by a wound, which makes think, like the previous point, that there are more ways to become infected, but As this form was slower than that of his friend.
It is not known whether by the blow that was made to the friend or by the smell of blood the blood, was the cause of the infection of this one.


Some details of the first story are:

• It is not known whether or not the child is infected, but the mother has a wound. Knowing the details of the second story, we can assume many situations.

When is it advisable for a person?

• This movie can be stressful if you are easy to hit, so this movie is recommended for you.
• If you are one of those people who make theories, this movie is recommended for you, since you can analyze a lot of data for it.
• If you like gore (everything the zombies do), then this movie does not have much of it, but it would be recommendable.
• If you are not one of those people previously mentioned, you may not be very interested in the movie.

 Due to the great gap and doubts that leaves the film, the final score is: 80 of 100.

Mangas Yaoi: Yuigon, Ikumen After2 , 50 x 50, Second Life VYO

Yuigon 

Typical teenage story?

It's a manga, about the lives of two high school students and their traumas of the past. At first they are presented as simple students, one is an average guy and the other a problematic. They discover that they have more in common and one conceals their feelings, making the end beautiful, something simple, but beautiful.

Although it may be thought to be a cliché story, one notices that it deviates from that point and the story changes to a different one than one thinks. Although they seem to sum up a larger story, it is a good summary that is complete story by itself, because they speak of the past and is more than enough to understand the story and do not feel lengthened.

Warnings: Contains shotacon (major with minor).   Final score: 95 -100.

 Ikumen After2   

Realistic?

The story is: Single parents know each other because their children are friends in kindergarten.

A good start in a love story.

Simple characters, simple story, entertaining, very normal and realistic in most points. As a cliché you can say that one of the protagonists falls in love at first sight is something already too used (at least for me), but leaving that aside is a very good story.

The story itself, only shows the protagonists, a little of their life before history ate (manga) and the people around them. Topics that tried that did not need to be extended, they showed enough to make the story nice, of course, those who read the manga, may want to know more, but that would already extend the story and although it may seem good, Drama, it would feel loaded and slow, with slow I mean desperate (since by some subject treated, social service agents could come). Sometimes, it is better to leave the stories as they are and that is enough.

In the part of the cliché in which one of the protagonists falls in love at first sight, is very used or at least for me to see something like that. It would have been better if a normal romance had been given, from a friendship created by the friendship of the children, which interest would have been given when they began to coexist at a certain point. But as mentioned before, it is only one point, but the rest is good.

This story, despite having that point previously mentioned.

Final Score: 100 out of 100.

It's realistic, interesting and it's one of these stories that, if you are someone who really likes high sexual content and you hope to find it, you just do not mind not finding it, or it is not explicit. Just good story. 

50 x 50

Dangers with alcohol?

The plot introduces us to two male characters, one has fetish for the legs and the other for the breasts. The plot shows a cycle that can be seen and repeated:

•  Your girlfriends vote for them.
•  They drink too much."
• They do not remember anything the next day.

  Both characters feel a certain binge, but their rivalry does not leave them. It's a story, interesting, funny, there are even parts where it detects a double standard and is funny, along with the part that apparently the protagonists have their female versions, as they meet two other women, who apparently spend it Same as them. A story, entertaining and that teaches that: If you get drunk, discover your gay side. Although that is not surprising, it simply entertains.

It is advisable to read and see, if you like that contains little sexual content, as it is recommended for you. If you like funny situations. Because this manga is for you.

The final score is: 100 out of 100.

Second Life VYO

Is there something wrong?

The story presents us when one of the protagonists messes with the wife of the boss's son. It is a good story, the characters and their past, in addition to the abuse of the stepbrothers (because a protagonist is the lover's son), making him take advantage of his position of power to annoy the other protagonist, but as they have known since The principle, can do no such thing.

The feelings are noticed when one of the protagonists does not bother him, this is because they knew each other in the past, but only one remembers and the other does not.

The plot is simple but entertaining, although it seems slow, we present several facets of one of the protagonists and the other notice. When it all ends, the story goes on, but explaining insignificant details that make the story entertaining and do not feel that the story is lengthened, making the true ending is acceptable.

Final score is: 90 out of 100.

Games: Fran Bow. It's complicated? - Inmortal Moral

We already know the game that came out in 2015. Fran Bow.

History: It is entertaining and graphically shocking. It begins as a simple story: Happy family, the little girl getting a gift cat, plays with them and witnesses the death of the parents. The last thing already begins to be out of place with what the story began. The girl tries to retrieve her kitten and return with her aunt, leave the mental hospital, in addition to the pills cause hallucinations or as mentioned in the game, "another reality." Thus begins the story of the girl and has an end that leaves much to think and history is rebelling telling the truth about those other "realities."

Playability; It is quite good, the mouse and keyboard are used.

Graphics: They are pretty good, both all "realities". They imply that every design of reality is unique beautiful. Both what is satanic, how is the world of nature, the normal world.

Characters: They are somewhat disturbing, but more by design (the satanic world), do not forget that they look like disturbed people who live an eternal hell. They are beautiful and colorful (I do not remember what it's called but it represents the world of the seasons, a world of peace), very opposed to the satanic characters, in addition to their friendship, they have no fear or fear. Characters of the human world: They are like the people you see every day, their worries, fears, anguish. Nothing bad.


Conclusion:
The worlds that appear, make you think about the people and the design of the characters makes you think about how they are emotionally minded or how they are related to the protagonist, be it friend, mother, or father. All the symbolism has meaning, in the end, you can do theories about the game and spend some time on that ..

Final Putuantion 100 of 100.